{"id":1893,"date":"2020-10-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-10-15T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/10\/15\/acs-virtual-postoperative-care-more-efficient-with-high-satisfaction\/"},"modified":"2020-10-16T16:10:05","modified_gmt":"2020-10-16T16:10:05","slug":"acs-virtual-postoperative-care-more-efficient-with-high-satisfaction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/10\/15\/acs-virtual-postoperative-care-more-efficient-with-high-satisfaction\/","title":{"rendered":"ACS: Virtual Postoperative Care More Efficient With High Satisfaction"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Time spent with provider similar to in-person, but total clinic time shorter with virtual visit<\/h3>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p>THURSDAY, Oct. 15, 2020 (HealthDay News) &#8212; The amount of time spent with a provider is similar for postoperative follow-up visits performed with either an in-person visit (IPV) or virtual visit (VV), according to a study presented at the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, held virtually from Oct. 3 to 7.<\/p>\n<p>Caroline Reinke, M.D., from Atrium Health in Charlotte, North Carolina, and colleagues compared total visit time and time spent with a provider between IPV and VV for postoperative follow-up. The analysis included 414 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy at two hospitals in an urban setting who were randomly assigned to VV or IPV (2:1) for follow-up care.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers found that postdischarge visits were completed for 65 percent of randomly assigned patients; of these patients, 55 VV crossed over to IPV. For IPVs, total clinic time was longer (58 versus 19 minutes; P \u2264 0.01). Provider time was similar for VV and IPV visits (8.3 versus 8.2 minutes; P = 0.91). Mean percent of IPV time with a provider was 8 percent when including driving time compared with 44 percent for VV. The groups showed similar satisfaction (94 percent versus 98 percent).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For patients who are hesitant about the value of a virtual visit, knowing they will get the same amount of time with a provider and satisfaction with the encounter may increase their interest,&#8221; the authors write.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facs.org\/media\/press-releases\/2020\/reinke-100320\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Press Release<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facs.org\/clincon2020\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">More Information<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Copyright \u00a9 2020 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.healthday.com\/\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">HealthDay<\/a>. All rights reserved.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Time spent with provider similar to in-person, but total clinic time shorter with virtual visit<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1914,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[85],"tags":[114,194,112],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1893"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1893\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}