{"id":5310,"date":"2020-12-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-12-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/12\/14\/sabcs-some-older-women-with-breast-cancer-may-opt-to-skip-rt\/"},"modified":"2020-12-16T16:10:26","modified_gmt":"2020-12-16T16:10:26","slug":"sabcs-some-older-women-with-breast-cancer-may-opt-to-skip-rt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/12\/14\/sabcs-some-older-women-with-breast-cancer-may-opt-to-skip-rt\/","title":{"rendered":"SABCS: Some Older Women With Breast Cancer May Opt to Skip RT"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>\n<p>Local recurrence increased but overall survival at 10 years similar with omission of RT in older women with HR+ breast cancer<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p>MONDAY, Dec. 14, 2020 (HealthDay News) &#8212; The omission of radiotherapy (RT) does not affect overall survival at 10 years after breast conserving surgery (BCS) for older women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, according to a study presented at the annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, held virtually from Dec. 8 to 11<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Ian H. Kunkler, from the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom, and colleagues examined the impact of locoregional RT after BCS on long-term outcomes in older patients receiving appropriate systemic therapy. A total of 1,326 patients aged \u00e2\u0089\u00a565 years, with axillary node-negative, hormone receptor- positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either receive or not receive (658 and 668, respectively) whole breast RT; patients were followed for a median of 7.3 years.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers found that at 10 years, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was 9.8 and 0.9 percent in the no RT and RT arms, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 0.12 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.31; P < 0.0001) for those receiving RT. Regional recurrence differed significantly (2.3 versus 0.5 percent with no RT and with RT, respectively; P = 0.014), but no differences were seen in contralateral breast cancer (P = 0.20) or distant metastases (P = 0.07). Breast cancer-free survival was 12.7 and 6.6 percent for the no RT and RT arms, respectively. At 10-years, overall survival was 80.4 and 81.0 percent without and with RT (P = 0.68).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We believe that omission of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery should be an option for older patients,&#8221; Kunkler said in a statement. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/aacr.ent.box.com\/s\/kjucuhrc4wwj2v785td44hphidkkc09e\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Press Release<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sabcs.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">More Information<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Copyright \u00a9 2020 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.healthday.com\/\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">HealthDay<\/a>. All rights reserved.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Local recurrence increased but overall survival at 10 years similar with omission of RT in older women with HR+ breast cancer<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":5559,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[85],"tags":[96,134,99],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5310"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5310\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}