{"id":5747,"date":"2020-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-12-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/12\/18\/recurrence-risk-low-after-one-year-of-watch-and-wait-for-rectal-cancer\/"},"modified":"2020-12-22T16:10:24","modified_gmt":"2020-12-22T16:10:24","slug":"recurrence-risk-low-after-one-year-of-watch-and-wait-for-rectal-cancer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/12\/18\/recurrence-risk-low-after-one-year-of-watch-and-wait-for-rectal-cancer\/","title":{"rendered":"Recurrence Risk Low After One Year of Watch-and-Wait for Rectal Cancer"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>\n<p>Authors say these findings suggest no need for intensive surveillance after three years<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p>FRIDAY, Dec. 18, 2020 (HealthDay News) &#8212; After sustaining a clinical complete response for one year with a watch-and-wait strategy following a complete response to rectal cancer treatment, risks for local regrowth and distant metastases during the subsequent two years are low, according to a study published online Dec. 11 in <em>The Lancet Oncology.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Laura M. Fernandez, M.D., from the Champalimaud Foundation in Lisbon, Portugal, and colleagues conducted conditional survival modeling using the International Watch &#038; Wait Database (47 clinics across 15 countries). The analysis included 793 adults with rectal cancer who had a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who were subsequently managed by a watch-and-wait strategy between Nov. 25, 1991, and Dec. 31, 2015.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers found that during a median follow-up of 55.2 months, the probability of remaining free from local regrowth for an additional two years was 88.1, 97.3, and 98.6 percent if a patient sustained a clinical complete response for one, three, and five years, respectively. Among patients who had a clinical complete response without distant metastases for one year, the probability of remaining free from distant metastases for a further two years was 93.8 percent; this probability increased to 97.8 and 96.6 percent for patients with a clinical complete response without distant metastases for three and five years, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These results suggest that the intensity of active surveillance in patients with rectal cancer managed by a watch-and-wait approach could be reduced if they achieve and maintain a clinical complete response within the first three years of starting this approach,&#8221; the authors write.<\/p>\n<p>Two authors disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lanonc\/article\/PIIS1470-2045(20)30557-X\/fulltext\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Abstract\/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Copyright \u00a9 2020 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.healthday.com\/\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">HealthDay<\/a>. All rights reserved.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Authors say these findings suggest no need for intensive surveillance after three years<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":5993,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[85],"tags":[322],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5747"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5747"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5747\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5993"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}