{"id":8252,"date":"2021-01-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-01-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2021\/01\/21\/supplemental-oxygen-often-unnecessary-during-childbirth\/"},"modified":"2021-01-22T18:10:26","modified_gmt":"2021-01-22T18:10:26","slug":"supplemental-oxygen-often-unnecessary-during-childbirth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2021\/01\/21\/supplemental-oxygen-often-unnecessary-during-childbirth\/","title":{"rendered":"Supplemental Oxygen Often Unnecessary During Childbirth"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>\n<p>Systematic literature review shows no significant improvement in umbilical artery pH or other neonatal outcomes<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p>THURSDAY, Jan. 21, 2021 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Use of maternal oxygen during childbirth is not associated with improved neonatal outcomes, according to a review published online Jan. 4 in <em>JAMA Pediatrics<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Nandini Raghuraman, M.D., from the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, and colleagues conducted a systematic literature review to identify randomized clinical trials comparing oxygen to room air at the time of scheduled cesarean delivery or labor in patients with singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies.<\/p>\n<p>Among 16 included studies (1,078 patients in the oxygen group; 974 patients in the room air group), the researchers observed significant heterogeneity; however, overall, oxygen administration was associated with no significant difference in umbilical artery (UA) pH (weighted mean difference, 0.00; 95 percent confidence interval, \u00e2\u0088\u00920.01 to 0.01). There was an increase seen in UA PaO<sub>2<\/sub> (weighted mean difference, 2.57 mm Hg; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.80 to 4.34 mm Hg) associated with oxygen use, but there was no significant difference in UA base excess, UA pH <7.2, Apgar scores, or neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Oxygen use in women undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery was associated with increased UA PaO<sub>2<\/sub> (weighted mean difference, 2.12 mm Hg; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.09 to 4.15 mm Hg) and a reduction in the incidence of UA pH <7.2 (relative risk, 0.63; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.90), but these findings were not seen among women using oxygen during labor (PaO<sub>2<\/sub>: weighted mean difference, 3.60 mm Hg [95 percent confidence interval, \u00e2\u0088\u00920.30 to 7.49 mm Hg]; UA pH <7.2: relative risk, 1.34 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.58 to 3.11]).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is such a common practice because the thought is that by giving mom oxygen, we are increasing oxygen transfer to the baby,&#8221; Raghuraman said in a statement. &#8220;However, the results of this study suggest that oxygen is not helpful in these cases and that the practice could be safely discontinued for many women.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamapediatrics\/fullarticle\/2774699\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Abstract\/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamapediatrics\/fullarticle\/2774691\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Copyright \u00a9 2020 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.healthday.com\/\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener\">HealthDay<\/a>. All rights reserved.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Systematic literature review shows no significant improvement in umbilical artery pH or other neonatal outcomes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":8467,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[85],"tags":[243],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8252"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8252"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8252\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}