{"id":866,"date":"2020-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-09-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/09\/22\/uspstf-finds-evidence-lacking-for-vitamin-d-screening\/"},"modified":"2020-09-23T16:10:09","modified_gmt":"2020-09-23T16:10:09","slug":"uspstf-finds-evidence-lacking-for-vitamin-d-screening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/2020\/09\/22\/uspstf-finds-evidence-lacking-for-vitamin-d-screening\/","title":{"rendered":"USPSTF Finds Evidence Lacking for Vitamin D Screening"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Current evidence inadequate to determine benefits and harms of screening for vitamin D deficiency<\/h3>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p>TUESDAY, Sept. 22, 2020 (HealthDay News) &#8212; The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that the current evidence is inadequate to recommend screening for vitamin D deficiency in asymptomatic adults. This finding forms the basis of a draft recommendation statement published online Sept. 22 by the USPSTF.<\/p>\n<p>Leila C. Kahwati, M.D., M.P.H., from RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in Research Triangle Park, and colleagues conducted a systematic review of 46 studies that assessed various doses, frequency, and duration of treatment with vitamin D to examine the benefits and harms of treatment. The researchers found that the evidence suggests that vitamin D treatment, with or without calcium, had no effect on most health outcomes; for some outcomes, the evidence was limited. Treatment had no impact on mortality, fractures, incidence of diabetes, incidence of cardiovascular disease, incidence of cancer, or depression among community-dwelling populations. Evidence was inconclusive for the effect of treatment on falls. Active treatment and control groups had a similar incidence of total adverse events, serious adverse events, and other harms.<\/p>\n<p>Based on these findings, the USPSTF concluded that there is a lack of evidence for the benefits of screening for vitamin D deficiency. Therefore, for asymptomatic adults, the balance of benefits and harms of screening for vitamin D deficiency cannot be determined (I statement). The draft recommendation statement and evidence review have been posted for public comment; comments can be submitted from Sept. 22 through Oct. 19, 2020.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t know the precise level of vitamin D in the body that leads to poor health outcomes, or which test might be a better indicator of vitamin D deficiency,&#8221; task force member John Wong, M.D., said in a statement. &#8220;Once we know the level of vitamin D that people need to remain healthy, or if there is a better test, more research on whether screening can help prevent negative outcomes, such as falls, cancer, or heart problems will be helpful.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org\/uspstf\/document\/draft-evidence-review\/vitamin-d-deficiency-screening-2021\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Draft Evidence Review<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org\/uspstf\/draft-recommendation\/vitamin-d-deficiency-screening-2021\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Draft Recommendation Statement<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org\/uspstf\/vitamin-d-screening-adults-draft-recommendation-statement\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Comment on Recommendation Statement<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Copyright \u00a9 2020 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.healthday.com\/\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">HealthDay<\/a>. All rights reserved.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Current evidence inadequate to determine benefits and harms of screening for vitamin D deficiency<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":888,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[85],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/866"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/866\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/888"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ec2-34-224-182-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com\/dermatology.healthcare.pro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}